labrys,
études féministes/ estudos feministas
WOMEN COMPOSERS
"When E M Smyth's heroically brassy overture
to Anthony & Cleopatra was
The gender question in regard to musicians makes me annoyed. What relevance does a person's sex have? Doesn't the quality of music making come more from a person's individual character than from the generalities of their sex? Although I complain about this question I also have to admit that I have had benefits from it as well. As the Director of my own orchestra, which performs music by both women and men, I've received a certain amount of extra press coverage because women composers and female Music Directors are still quite rare, and considered newsworthy by the media. Somebody once told me that women's brains are different and simply don't have in them the capacity to create artistically. Similarly Wilhelm Gericke (the Boston Symphony's Musical Adviser) told Amy Cheney/Beach's mother that her prodigy daughter should not be educated in Europe as women were intellectually less highly evolved than men. How sad that we are seen as strange animals, so "differently" endowed. Could it be that our capacity to produce new human life is so major a threat for men that they have to keep the creation of symphonies (etc) to themselves?
My involvement with music by women arose quite by chance, when I came across a description about Germaine Tailleferre's Piano Concerto in a book on French music. Only then (aged 36) did it occur to me that I'd never heard anything written by a women composer. I was shocked to think that I had never questioned it before. Curiosity got the better of me, and I went looking for the music. With some difficulty I got hold of the Tailleferre score, and discovered an utterly delightful work from Paris in the 1920s. Then I simply couldn't turn my back on the injustice. Why did we know nothing about music by women? What else was there that I'd never heard of? I had to find out and then help to set the record straight. So I went looking in libraries; the more I dug, the more I found, and the more I saw how much beautiful music has been neglected . Many people know about Schumann and Mendelssohn - Clara and Fanny, that is. Their famous surnames make them easy to remember, which is not to acknowledge that they were both exceptional individuals. Clara's achievements as one of the greatest pianists of the 19th century is well documented. Only recently have we got to know her highly expressive voice as a composer. Fanny sustained a musical life despite considerable discouragement; her compositions, which she wrote for her own Sunday Musicales, demonstrate an energetic and adventurous nature. Picking two names that are less well known, Louise Farrenc and Marianne Martinez embody some other characteristics, including steady devotion to music and sturdy determination to pursue their interests regardless of others' attitudes. "Mozart was an almost constant attendant at her parties and I have heard him play duets of his own composition on the piano-forte with her." This was reported by the tenor Michael Kelly of Marianne Martinez in about 1785. Lucky woman! Martinez's substantial canon of work indicates an ambitious imagination. She not only wrote Concertos, Sonatas, Cantatas and Masses, but also a huge dramatic Oratorio. Louise Farrenc was also an acknowledged part of the musical scene of her day, which was Paris in the mid 19th century. She received appreciative reviews about her compositions, including compliments from Berlioz on her orchestration. One of her clever moves was to marry a music publisher, which meant that many of her works were issued in print. Her best works are for piano and chamber ensemble and her style includes some beautiful use of chromatic harmony.
In the UK, there is one simple way of illustrating the level of interest in music by women: statistics from the Promenade concerts. The best it's ever been was to include music by five women, usually compared to sixty or so men. Even in the year of the 100th anniversary of Clara Schumann's death, there was only one work by a woman - her Piano Trio. Nicholas Kenyon received a good deal of flack for his unblanced programming of the 2006 Prom season. "What is music by women like?" is a question I'm often asked. Usually I refrain from asking what music by men is like, or reacting to the whiff of expectation regarding sentimental salon bon-bons. Individual personality is so much more interesting than gender generalisations. To me, the point is that people should hear the music and make their own minds up from listening. People seem nervous about listening to music by women, and reviewers are visibly reluctant to show ignorance. Their attitudes come through even so - both the obstinately closed minded and the determinedly politically correct, while others avoid communicating any quality of experience and tell the composer's life story instead. There have been many attempts to get music by women recorded. An important contribution, but prone to many problems. Sad to say, I think there are a number of recordings in the catalogue which could be described as "worthy" offerings but which don't actually enhance our appreciation of this lost repertoire. The public's knowledge and understanding could be changed indeed by the creation of a large body of high quality recordings, which could be played regularly on the classical music broadcast networks. With this aim, I approached several recording companies with a plan for a substantial new series of recordings, to bring the work to public attention. I even had a marketing proposal for joining up with Virago, and selling the discs alongside their books in bookshops. Quite a number of the recording executives I spoke to showed considerable interest in the "new and interesting idea". When they came to look at budgets, and the idea of committing good money to such a project, suddenly the tune changed! To their credit, Carlton Classics did produce a mini-series of three new recordings in 1997 (Farrenc, Strozzi and Schumann) which all got good reviews, but no money was allocated for marketing or advertising and little more was seen of them.
This is an erratic and unpredictable process. Many women composers were successful in their day, but forgotten when they died. Many had their music published, so some scores can be found (with luck) in libraries; indeed some manuscripts are there too. Having unearthed a certain number of interesting works by women in British libraries, I was given a grant by the Arts Council of England to explore libraries in Vienna, Berlin and Paris. More pieces emerged. Sometimes just the parts, sometimes just the score. I've spent many hours writing up the missing score or parts, and have enjoyed getting a feel for how this or that composer worked. I began to get to know Farrenc's effervescent energy while copying the parts for her Sextet for Piano and Wind Op 40. Nowadays I can do it on the Sibelius computer programme. Most tantalising of all has been to read about a work in a history or reference book, but then not find the music anywhere. Ruefully I observe that this era of high speed electronic communication, and library access, may not deliver back to us this lost corpus of work. There were several reasons mitigating against
women becoming composers. Usually the individuals who overcame the problems
did so because of their love of music and their determination to pursue
their interests regardless. Marianne Martinez is a typical example of
the kind of independent mind - she wrote extensively in many genres, and
clearly composed because she loved it. Farrenc illustrates another aspect,
normally associated with 20th century women: the juggling act of looking
after a family, performing, teaching (she was an early pioneer in the
issue of equal pay for equal work) and composing. Last but not least she
also did academic research: a century before the early music movement,
Farrenc published the 24 volume Tresor des Pianistes, keyboard music of
the three preceding centuries. The most obvious obstacle was just the lack of a proper musical education. If they were lucky, musical girls were born into a musical family (Fanny Mendelssohn), the aristocracy (the two Anna Amalias, Frederick the Great's sister and niece), or went into a Nunnery (Hildegard, and Isabella Leonarda) and grew up with music around them. Just as important is the whole business of
learning on the job. Most of what I know about performance and communication
I've learnt through the process of doing it, and working with my professional
colleagues. Mozart and Haydn had constant feedback about their compositions
in their everyday lives. Few women composers of the past had that living
experience of hearing their work, learning from it, and moving on to the
next level. "Perhaps for Felix music will become
a profession, while for you it will always remain but an ornament; never
can and should it become the foundation of your existence." This
letter from Abraham Mendelssohn to his daughter Fanny has become one of
the most famous discouragements in musical history. It is also a classic
expression of society's long-held view that it was not acceptable for
a woman to compose. Recently we've come to know of the phenomenal talents
of both the Mendelssohn siblings. To the credit of their parents, Fanny
received the same musical education as Felix. However restrictive social
attitudes deprived us of her subsequent developments as a major creative
talent. Clara Schumann - virtuoso pianist, composer, teacher and mother of seven - wrote in her diary in 1839: "I once thought I possessed creative talent, but I have given up this idea; a woman must not desire to compose - there has never yet been one able to, and why should I expect to be the one?" Of course I know that self-doubt is not a uniquely female characteristic, but (apologies for the generalisation) there seems to be something about masculine assertiveness that covers over, or gets round this form of nerves.
Let me go back to Ethyl Smyth. She had a favourite legend about rivalry: one afternoon while Adam was asleep, Eve, anticipating the Great God Pan, bored some holes in a hollow reed and began to what we call `pick out a tune'. Thereupon Adam woke; "Stop that horrible noise," he roared, adding, after a pause, "besides which, if anyone's going to make it, it's not you but me." The big musical competitions are generally won by men. I have no wish to "beat" others in contest, I simply want to make music. However, we live in a very competitive world, and that may be one reason why there are less women at the top. Some people think that men's success comes from talent while women's comes from hard work, which is irksome in not acknowledging women's abilities. A recording company executive trying to show his open-mindedness once said to me "if only there was one world-breaking piece, then we'd be on." Images of shattering the sound barrier came to mind, and once again I felt that the real point - the quality of the music - simply didn't feature.
In 1939 Nadia Boulanger was asked what it was like to be the first woman to conduct the Boston Symphony Orchestra in the world première of Stravinsky's Dumbarton Oaks. She replied "Well, I have been a woman for 50 years now and have recovered from my initial astonishment." Even now there seems to be a difference in attitude between composers and performers. Jane Austen novels include many fine descriptions of the value to her young heroines of having musical skills, particularly when it came to attracting a spouse. While people might not think of that as a way of courting a husband today, there is still something of the idea that female performers are glamorous and sexy - or should be. Some of my female colleagues have been reviewed for their concert clothes! Can you imagine anyone saying that Mozart wasn't worth listening to because he was short and ugly? Anyone who puts their head above the parapet will get shot at: all conductors and musical directors have to prove themselves. However, as in all walks of life, it still seems that women have to be extra good to get accepted. Generally I choose to play with musicians who won't get stuck on gender, but occasionally I can sense I'm being challenged just to see if I'm tough enough to take it. As any musician should, I prepare very thoroughly and try to communicate clearly what I want. Those are the standards I judge others by, not by their sex.
In these days of political correctness people keep their prejudices to themselves, so it's hard to pinpoint. I cited some data from the Proms earlier in this article, and I offer a story from my orchestra's experience. In 1995-7 we did a concert series in London featuring music by women composers, presenting several premières of music by women of the last 250 years. BBC Radio 3 producers were invited to every one of the nine concerts, but didn't come to any - in other words they were not willing to listen to any of this music. This looks like prejudice. But the series did make a difference. I'm happy to report that the London Times commented at the end "over the last three years they have performed 11 premières by women composers ... rewriting musical history in the process."
With the best will in the world, we are all prejudiced at times. Colleagues in my Orchestra are generally open minded, and on being faced with playing music by a "new" (usually old) woman composer, they are willing give her a go and enjoy the discovery. Finding the way any individual's musical language works always takes time, and given enough time we usually develop a sense of style. Once, when we hadn't arrived at a proper interpretation during the rehearsal, I heard comments in the vein of "this is what gives women's music a bad name". Later, when it came together in the concert the prejudice evaporated, and the comments changed to "that really had something". It's so easy to blame the composer for our inadequate understanding. When I think about the amount of time I have spent developing my Mozart-playing skills, it bears no comparison. We have all heard music by Mozart all our lives; we have all learnt from the understanding of many generations before us, and we come to his music with a huge amount of experience and familiarity. When I make a "first recording" of music by women, I wonder what it will sound like when it gets to a tenth generation version.
As I've become known for reviving music
by women, I've noticed people making assumptions from that fact: for example
that my orchestra must be women players only. After all, I must be a feminist
who would only play with women, and men wouldn't play music by women,
would they? Ironically, because my orchestra is freelance, and there are
more female freelance players in London, I sometimes have to discriminate
positively in favour of men in order to keep the balance more or less
equal. A criticism often levelled at women composers
of the past is that they weren't radical, original or ground breaking.
There are so many ways to be creative, and any composer who finds their
own authentic voice has been innovative, and I believe many women have
done that. Women have made music in many unprecedented ways. Sometimes composers are accused of being
too obviously derivative of their teachers. While it's clear what influence
Farrenc got from Hummel and Moscheles, I'm shocked when I see her music
described as a recycling of those styles, and I always note that the writer
has shown up their own lack of hearing. The Trio for clarinet, cello and
piano Op 44 illustrates her unique sense of harmony, and balance between
discipline and emotion. In talking about the music by women which I've been reviving, I've found it helps to try and give a historical context. Usually this means referring to a male composer who was a contemporary, or with whom there are stylistic connections. I wish it was possible to place them in history without hitching them to a male reference, but I haven't found a better way.
The years of work I've spent digging up, editing, learning and performing music by women have been challenging, stimulating and enriching in many ways. As a classical specialist, Clara, Fanny, Louise and Amy have provoked me into exploring new avenues of creative expression, and they've inspired me as women of tremendous character and strength. I notice that other people also seem pleased at discovering what women have created, as if it was a missing piece in our cultural heritage that is now becoming audible again. When I started writing this article I wanted to say that gender issues are beside the point - just trendy talk. I wanted to say this is irrelevant; all that matters is the music. But I see I can't. These questions are still vividly with us, and will be for the foreseeable future. Biographhy Diana Ambache
was Musical Director and Solo Pianist of the Ambache Chamber Orchestra
from 1984 to 2008 (www.ambache.co.uk). She was the only woman in the UK
to found and direct her own Classical chamber orchestra, and has made
16 new CD recordings. She has performed solo, chamber and concerto concerts
in 33 countries on 5 continents. As well as being a Mozart specialist,
she pioneered the revival of music by women composers of the last 300
years. Her research, editing, performing and recording work was recognised
by being short-listed for the European Women of Achievement Awards 2002.
Her findings can be seen on www.womenofnote.co.uk. She has taught Mozart
at Dartington International Music Summer School, and taught creativity
and teamwork at various London Business Schools. She was a specialist
music lecturer for Martin Randall Travel, and has made frequent broadcast
interviews and features on the BBC radio networks
labrys,
études féministes/ estudos feministas |